收藏本站
《华中科技大学》 2011年
收藏 | 手机打开
二维码
手机客户端打开本文

腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术的基础与临床动态对比研究

瓦沙比  
【摘要】:PartⅠClinical Comparative analysis of laparoscopic versus conventional splenectomy Background:Since the first technique has been reported of laparoscopic splenectomy by Delaitre in 1991, this developed rapidly due to its advantages of minimal incision, quick recovery and little complications. In many hospitals, LS has become the first choice of curing hematopathy, especially idiopathic thrombocytopenic purpura (ITP). Objective:To evaluate the clinical situation and minimally invasive procedures (laproscopic) used in abdominal surgery. On the same period and underwent open splenectomy, Laparoscopic splenectomy were compared between two groups of patients,the saftey,efficacy and superiority of laparoscopic splenectomy in the clinical applications. Evaluation of minimally invasive surgery (laparoscopic surgery) in the clinical application status and value of exploring new surgical method. Methods:From April 2009 to February 2011, patients received laparoscopic and open splenectomy at Huazhong University of Science and technology, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College. We record the operative time, blood loss during operation, postoperative eating time, drainage time, postoperative hospital stay and hospitalization cost. Statistical analysis are made using SPSS 13.0 for windows. Results:There are 65 cases enrolled, in which 35 cases are laparoscopic splenectomy,30 cased are open splenectomy.No complications were found. Two groups of patients in the gender and age is similar. LS operative time (157.31±40.20minutes) longer than the conventional splenectomy (135±24.45) p= 0.0102. Two groups's cases of blood loss are (189±83.88ml,54.57±21.47ml) for OS and LS respectively P.0001, postoperative eating time (4.33±0.61days,2.66±0.54days) for OS and LS respectively P.0001. Conventional splenectomy group postoperative hospital stay (11.57±2.16 days) longer than the LS group (8.57±1.14days) P.0001.In Laparoscopic splenectomy there were little Perioperative blood loss,fast postoperative recovery,blood cell number gradually recovering just after operation. And no complications. Conclusion:Laparoscopic splenectomy is a feasible,effective and safe surgical procedure for patients with hematologic diseases or for patients who require splenectomy and have a normal to medium-sized enlarged spleen. Laparoscopic splenectomy is safe and effective to some splenic diseases which satisfy the indication.Though its operation time is longer than open splenectomy, there are significant differences in blood loss and postoperation eating time between the two operations. And the postoperative hospital stay of laparoscopic splenectomy is shorter than open splenectomy. Part II Comparison between inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and conventional splenectomy Objective:To compare the systemic and local inflammatory responses after laparoscopic and conventional splenectomy. Methods:From April 2009 to February 2011, patients enrolled in this study received laparoscopic (n=35) and open splenectomy (n=30),the inflammatory responses were compared between the two groups. TNF-α、IL-6、IFN-γ、IL-4、IL-1βand CRP concentrations in serum and PDF were measured with ELISA kits. Results:There were no significant differences in age,sex and preoperative levels of hemoglobin and albumin between the two groups(P0.05). Serum IL-6, TNF-alpha, IL-1β, IFN-y, IL-4 and CRP plasma levels were measured in 35 laparoscopic and 30 conventionally treated patients. PDF TNF-alpha and CRP too. Preoperative plasma levels of TNF-αIL-6、IFN-γ, IL-4、IL-1β,CRP,WBC and NE were not different between each group(P0.05). The plasma concentrations of TNF-α、IL-6、IFN-γ、IL-4、IL-1β,CRP increased postoperatively and remained above the preoperative plasma concentrations during the first postoperative week(P0.05). postoperative plasma levels of TNF-α、IL-6、IFN-γ、IL-4、IL-1β,CRP,WBC and NE were higher in the conventional than in the laparoscopic group(P0.05) were significantly lower in laparoscopic group than those in conventional group. peritoneal drainage fluid (PDF) TNF-a and CRP levels were significantly lower in laparoscopic group than that of conventional group(P0.05). Conclusion:In early stage after operation, intra-peritoneal inflammatory response and systemic inflammatory response caused by laparoscopic surgery is slightly lower than that of conventional splenectomy PartⅢThe Influence of Laparoscopic and conventional splenectomy On Immune function Immune function is a defensive ability of resisting infection, including immunologic defence, immunologic homeostasis and immunologic surveillance. Immunoglobulin and complements are having the effect of resisting bacteria and viruses in the body. As immunocompetent cell, T lymphocyte has the effect of immunologic surveillance. Immunoreaction of T lymphocyte has important effect in resisting infections, NK cell is a lymphocyte, It has killer ability and play role in immunologic surveillance. It had recently been discovered that wounds of surgical operation could influence immune function. Laparoscopic operations were rapidly developed because it has a little wound and pain.Several abroad studies had reported about the Influence of laparoscopic splenectomy on immune system. Investigation and comparison values of laparoscopic splenectomy and conventional splenectomy are variable on the immunoglobulins, complements and T lymphocyte. To study the Influence of laparoscopic splenectomy and conventional splenectomy on immune system. We selected 65 ITP patients. Laparoscopic splenectomy 35 patient and conventional splenectomy 30 patients were enrolled in the study.the Immune function responses were compared between the two groups.There was no significant difference of sex and age between two groups (P0.05). Blood samples were obtained at study entry preoperative and at day 1、5 postoperatively. Samples were collected in plastic tubes. Serum was prepared to examine immunoglobulin (IgG,,IgA,IgE,IgM),complement(C3、C4) and T lymphocyte(CD3,CD4,CD8,CD(16+56),CD 19). The examination of immunoglobulin and complements selected reagent and instrument from the American DER Lin Company, applying immunoradiometric assay. The examination of lymphocyte selected reagent and instrument from the American Kurete company and selected reagent from German company (IgG1-FITC/IgG1-PE, CD3-EITC/CD4-PE CD3-FITC/CD8-PE, CD3-FITC/CD (16+56)-PE, IgGI-PE, IgG2a-FITC, CD10-PE, CD3-PE, CD8-PE). Postoperative levels of serum immunoglobulin and complements of laparoscopic splenectomy and conventional splenectomy were lower than preoperative levels. The difference was not statistically significant (p0.05). But the level of serum C3 was significantly decreased after conventional splenectomy, from 2.19±0.26g/L to 0.97±0.24g/L and 1.12±0.23g/L; the difference was statistically significant(p0.05 or p0.01). The level of serum IgG was significantly decreased after conventional splenectomy, from 13.09±1.96g/Lto 11.45±2.24 g/L and 11.93±3.05g/L, the difference was statistically significant(p0.05 or p0.01). But the levels of serum C3 and IgG after conventional splenectomy decreased more significantly than laparoscopic splenectomy, the difference was statistically significant (p0.05 or p0.01). Postoperative levels of serum CD8, CD(16+56) and CD19 of conventional splenectomy were slightly decreased than preoperation, the difference was not statistically significant(p0.05). The level of serum CD3 decreased significantly in conventional splenectomy, from 57.88±2.97%to 55.98±4.08%and 51.03±4.02%, the difference was statistically significant(p0.05 or p0.01). The level of serum CD4 was significantly decreased after conventional splenectomy, from 37.31±2.96%to 36.14±3.49%and 30.49±3.93%, the difference was statistically significant(p0.05 or p0.01).The level of CD4/CD8 was significantly decreased after conventional splenectomy, from 1.37±0.72 to 1.54±0.69 and 1.25±0.87, the difference was statistically significant(p0.05). But postoperative levels of serum CD3, CD4, CD8, CD(16+56), CD 19 and CD4/CD8 of laparoscopic splenectomy were slightly decreased than preoperation, and recovered normally to the basal line 5 days after operation, the difference is not statistically significant(p0.05). The differences of two groups were statistically significant (p0.01).Both laparoscopic splenectomy and conventional splenectomy could cause a certain degree suppresion of immune function in the earlier postoperative period. But laparoscopic splenectomy caused less suppression of immune function than conventional splenectomy did and recovery of the immunosuppression in laparoscopic splenectomy was faster than in conventional splenectomy. That is to say, laparoscopy procedure was less traumatic.
【学位授予单位】:华中科技大学
【学位级别】:博士
【学位授予年份】:2011
【分类号】:R657.6

手机知网App
【引证文献】
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前1条
1 王跃斌;不同脾蒂血管离断法在腹腔镜下脾切除术中的对比研究[D];兰州大学;2017年
【参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前2条
1 李学华;隋永领;胡三元;李洪光;刘志恒;刘桂杰;;腹腔镜胆囊切除术对机体免疫功能的影响[J];腹腔镜外科杂志;2007年04期
2 ;Comparative evaluation of immune response after laparoscopical and open total mesorectal excisions with anal sphincter preservation in patients with rectal cancer[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2003年12期
【共引文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 赖添武;赵权;徐奎;莫志和;林坤娟;黄敏;林世雨;;腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌切除术对机体免疫功能影响的Meta分析[J];结直肠肛门外科;2015年03期
2 李威;夏涛;甘涛;罗运生;杨颢;;肠内外营养对胃癌根治性切除术患者免疫功能的影响[J];中国癌症防治杂志;2015年02期
3 黄进堂;蒙婷婷;王少勇;张忠民;;腹腔镜与开腹直肠癌手术对患者免疫功能的影响[J];广东医学;2015年01期
4 李锐;孙继林;章军;张修稳;;经腹腔镜、开腹胆囊切除术对老年患者血清C反应蛋白、IL-6、TNF-α的影响[J];国际医药卫生导报;2014年24期
5 郭灿;向江琳;邹中辉;章伟;郭宁;;开腹与腹腔镜直肠癌根治术后炎性反应的比较[J];南昌大学学报(医学版);2014年11期
6 张新亚;黄士随;;老年患者腹腔镜胆囊切除术与开腹胆囊切除术的临床对照研究[J];肝胆外科杂志;2014年03期
7 关磐石;;腹腔镜下胆囊切除前后免疫功能监测的临床研究[J];工企医刊;2014年03期
8 艾尼瓦尔·克依木;张恩伟;;腹腔镜胆囊切除术对患者肝功能及免疫功能的影响[J];胃肠病学和肝病学杂志;2014年06期
9 赵冬雨;成丽娅;于健;;腹腔镜与开腹胆囊切除术对患者肝功能及免疫功能的影响[J];中国普外基础与临床杂志;2014年01期
10 谭立军;潘爱欢;;腹腔镜与小切口直肠癌根治术影响机体细胞免疫功能的比较[J];中国医药导刊;2014年01期
【二级参考文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前4条
1 赵刚,肖刚,黄美雄,龙海空;腹腔镜结直肠癌根治对机体免疫状态的影响[J];中华胃肠外科杂志;2005年05期
2 王勇,张斌蓉,王青,倪平,赵若愚,侯梅瑾,徐磐;腹腔镜胆囊切除术对机体炎症免疫反应的影响[J];中国微创外科杂志;2004年05期
3 胡明秋;腹腔镜手术对机体免疫和代谢的影响[J];腹腔镜外科杂志;2001年01期
4 周汉新,高金波;腹腔镜术与剖腹术对机体免疫功能影响的比较[J];同济医科大学学报;1997年06期
【相似文献】
中国期刊全文数据库 前10条
1 黄军伟;洪明;阎雄;;腹腔镜脾切除术的研究进展[J];中国微创外科杂志;2014年02期
2 ;Laparoscopic splenectomy:the latest technical evaluation[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2003年05期
3 Yong Huang;Xiao-Yun Wang;Kai Wang;;Hand-assisted laparoscopic splenectomy is a useful surgical treatment method for patients with excessive splenomegaly: A metaanalysis[J];World Journal of Clinical Cases;2019年03期
4 Ming-Jun Wang;Wen-Wu Ling;Hong Wang;Ling-Wei Meng;He Cai;Bing Peng;;Non-invasive evaluation of liver stiffness after splenectomy in rabbits with CCl_4-induced liver fibrosis[J];World Journal of Gastroenterology;2016年46期
5 Dong Zheng;Chen-Song Huang;Shao-Bin Huang;Chao-Xu Zheng;;Laparoscopic splenectomy for primary immune thrombocytopenia:Current status and challenges[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2016年17期
6 Evangelos P Misiakos;George Bagias;Theodore Liakakos;Anastasios Machairas;;Laparoscopic splenectomy:Current concepts[J];World Journal of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy;2017年09期
7 Khaled Al-raimi;Shu-Sen Zheng;;Postoperative outcomes after open splenectomy versus laparoscopic splenectomy in cirrhotic patients:a meta-analysis[J];Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International;2016年01期
8 Tomoya Okazaki;Toru Hifumi;Arisa Manabe;Hikari Matsumura;Satoshi Egawa;Hideyuki Hamaya;Nastuyo Shinohara;Koshiro Takano;Hajime Shishido;Yuko Abe;Kenya Kawakita;Masanobu Hagiike;Yasuhiro Kuroda;;Invasive group B streptococcal infection in a patient with post splenectomy for hypersplenism secondary to liver cirrhosis and portal hypertension[J];World Journal of Emergency Medicine;2016年01期
9 Marco Casaccia;Cesare Stabilini;Ezio Gianetta;Adalberto Ibatici;Gregorio Santori;;Current concepts of laparoscopic splenectomy in elective patients[J];World Journal of Surgical Procedures;2014年02期
10 Yan-Bin Ni;Peng-Ji Gao;Dong Wang;Zhao Li;Ji-Ye Zhu;;Esophagogastric devascularization without splenectomy in portal hypertension: safe and effective?[J];Hepatobiliary & Pancreatic Diseases International;2015年03期
中国重要会议论文全文数据库 前10条
1 任艳;刘辉;宋文艳;郝爱琴;李璐;刘霜;陈煜;段钟平;郑素军;;Idiopathic portal hypertension presenting with hepatic nodular regenerative hyperplasia after splenectomy:a case report[A];第十届全国疑难及重症肝病大会论文汇编[C];2019年
2 ;Laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic diseases with splenomegaly[A];浙江省微创外科学术交流会暨浙江省医学会微创外科学分会成立大会论文汇编[C];2008年
3 Honghui Wang;Zeping Zhou;;A 10-year change of the diagnosis and treatment strategy of primary immune thrombocytopenia among Chinese hematologists[A];第十三届全国免疫学学术大会分会场交流报告[C];2018年
4 ;Splenectomy and its effect on bovine immunologic function[A];全国兽医外科学第13次学术研讨会、小动物医学第1次学术研讨会暨奶牛疾病第3次学术讨论会论文集[C];2006年
5 Jinhui Zhu;Wei LI;Xiaoli Zhan;Kai Yu;Wanbo Wu;Dijian Shen;Yuedong Wang;;Primary versus secondary splenic pedicle dissection in laparoscopic splenectomy for splenic diseases[A];2012年浙江省外科学学术年会论文集[C];2012年
6 Yuedong Wang;Yun Ji;Xiaoli Zhan;Jinhui Zhu;Wei Li;Hao Tang;;Laparoscopic Splenectomy and Azygoportal Disconnection with Intraoperative Self Spleen Blood Salvage[A];2012年浙江省外科学学术年会论文集[C];2012年
7 王跃东;叶再元;竺杨文;谢志杰;张威;刘原兴;刘金明;赵挺;;腹腔镜脾切除术10年经验总结[A];浙江省微创外科学术交流会暨浙江省医学会微创外科学分会成立大会论文汇编[C];2008年
8 王跃东;叶再元;竺杨文;谢志杰;张威;刘原兴;刘金明;赵挺;;腹腔镜脾切除术10年经验总结[A];2006年浙江省微创外科学术会议论文汇编[C];2006年
9 戴启强;王爱东;方哲平;;腹腔镜脾切除术20例治疗体会[A];2009年浙江省外科学学术年会论文汇编[C];2009年
10 傅永清;周剑;顾文扬;裘华森;任燕燕;张喆;姚宏娜;;腹腔镜脾切除术65例临床研究[A];第五届中国中西医结合围手术期医学研讨会论文集[C];2010年
中国重要报纸全文数据库 前10条
1 记者 李娜;国内首创新型腹腔镜脾切除术[N];吉林日报;2012年
2 本报记者;单孔腹腔镜脾切除术在滇成功实施[N];云南日报;2011年
3 记者 宗河;博士学位论文抽检比例为10%左右[N];中国教育报;2014年
4 记者 王庆环;2013年全国优秀博士学位论文公布[N];光明日报;2014年
5 本报记者 明海英;提高博士学位论文整体质量仍需多方努力[N];中国社会科学报;2014年
6 侯红武 秦洋;山大青年教授殷杰获全国优秀博士学位论文奖[N];山西日报;2004年
7 记者 朱建华 实习生 周恋芹 张伟峰;武汉7篇博士学位论文入围“全国优秀”[N];长江日报;2010年
8 王握文周珞晶 吴丹;11篇全国优秀博士学位论文的启示[N];科技日报;2008年
9 本报记者 王握文 通讯员 周珞晶;11篇全国优秀博士学位论文的背后[N];解放军报;2008年
10 记者 清周 清新 彦生;我校11篇论文入选2007年全国优秀博士学位论文[N];新清华;2007年
中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 瓦沙比;腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术的基础与临床动态对比研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
2 NASSER WATHAB;[D];华中科技大学;2011年
3 刘珍;腹腔镜脾切除术治疗特发性血小板减少性紫癜的实验和临床研究[D];吉林大学;2008年
4 Shadi Ibrahim;[D];华中科技大学;2011年
5 宫丽;精神家园论[D];华中科技大学;2011年
6 杨道州;对抗焦虑—方方小说新论[D];华中科技大学;2015年
7 Sarah Mustafa Eljack;[D];华中科技大学;2010年
8 郑剑;社会资本论[D];华中科技大学;2011年
9 胡沈明;现代新闻评论宽容意识研究[D];华中科技大学;2011年
10 吴剑平;中国社会转型中的政府俘获行为研究[D];华中科技大学;2012年
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 刘贵奇;腹腔镜脾切除术与开腹脾切除术治疗外伤性脾破裂的临床对比[D];吉林大学;2015年
2 丁国建;腹腔镜与开腹脾切除术治疗血液疾病围手术期临床疗效比较的Meta分析[D];新疆医科大学;2013年
3 董擂;腹腔镜脾切除术治疗血液病的临床分析[D];大连医科大学;2004年
4 游科;肝硬化门脉高压症巨脾行全腹腔镜脾切除术的临床研究[D];重庆医科大学;2016年
5 黄军伟;影响腹腔镜脾切除治疗免疫性血小板减少性紫癜疗效的多因素分析[D];重庆医科大学;2013年
6 阿力木江·麦斯依提;腹腔镜脾切除术的临床应用[D];新疆医科大学;2009年
7 曹源;腹腔镜与开腹脾切除联合贲门周围血管离断术治疗门脉高压症的回顾性分析研究[D];新乡医学院;2016年
8 图酷尔(Avinash Seeburrun);[D];华中科技大学;2012年
9 吕永峰;腹腔镜脾切除术的临床应用[D];浙江大学;2006年
10 刘腾;杂交式单孔腹腔镜脾切除术的临床应用研究[D];山东大学;2013年
中国知网广告投放
 快捷付款方式  订购知网充值卡  订购热线  帮助中心
  • 400-819-9993
  • 010-62791813
  • 010-62985026