收藏 | 手机打开


【摘要】: The present study investigates the L2 acquisition of English psych predicates which pose a linking problem for theoretical linguists and a learnability problem for ESL/EFL learners. Psych predicates assign the theta role of Experiencer to the NP that experiences the emotion described by the predicate. In cases like Small children fear dogs, the Experiencer appears in the subject position whereas in other cases like Dogs frighten small children it surfaces in the object position. In the absence of negative evidence, how do Chinese-speaking learners of English acquire the knowledge as to what determines the mapping of Experiencer into subject and object position? This learnability problem is approached within the generative framework, through a linguistic analysis of psych predicates in light of lexical determinism and Pesetsky' s fine-grained semantic analysis. The syntactically relevant meaning component that sets psych verbs apart into two different types, and determines their relevant semantic structure is zero CAUS, a covert and phonologically null CAUSE embodied in Object Experiencer (OE) predicates. The analysis shows that the acquisition of psych predicates can boil down to the recognition of this argument-structure-changing morphology zero CAUS in OE verbs and V-ing adjectives (VingAs). Zero CAUS is further examined in the typological framework. A typological causativization parameter is developed on the basis of a cross- linguistic analysis, which demonstrates that English has both lexical and analytical causatives and so does Chinese, arguably. What English and Chinese differ is the canonical setting/value of the parameter lexical for the former and analytical for the latter. The linguistic and cross-linguistic analyses lead to the central research question: What triggers the recognition of zero CAUS in OE verbs and VingAs? A Semantic Salience Hierarchy Model is established to address the question. To assess the plausibility of our model, 9 specific hypotheses about four identified variables, i.e., cross-linguistic influence, a UG component, elements in TL input, and animacy, were investigated using a writing production task and a grammaticality judgement task. 126 learners of three different levels (i.e., elementary, intermediate and advanced), together with 32 native speakers of English, participated in the investigation. The results show that L2 learners gradually developed sensitivity to zero CAUS and reset the parameter as their English proficiency improved. Lower level learners were significantly more accurate on Mutual OE verbs than on Exclusive TL OE verbs, suggesting the influence of a latent causativization rule in Chinese. Within the TL elements, a facilitating effect was found with the overt causative morphology like -en, but an inhibitory effect was found with the further affixation of -ing to the zero-derived OE verbs in VingAs. L2 learners behaved like native speakers in accepting inchoative/stative use of alternating verbs, lending support to their respect of Thematic Hierarchy, a UG component. Higher level learners showed the same tendency as that of native speakers to prefer inanimate Causer over animate ones in both OE verbs and VingAs. All these findings empirically verified the Semantic Salience Hierarchy Model. Furthermore, the IL development demonstrates a clear interaction between the morphosyntactic kno wledge of zero CAUS, L1 transfer, UG and animacy.

中国期刊全文数据库 前20条
1 马惠琼;;Syntactical and Lexical Significance in Balfour's“Identity Crisis”[J];海外英语;2018年06期
2 陈璠;;Lexical Richness and Overall Language Proficiency[J];海外英语;2019年05期
3 王媛;;A Study of Chinese Internet Language[J];校园英语;2017年30期
4 金宁;;The Literature Review of lexical Chunks Based on corpus[J];校园英语;2017年43期
5 张丽昕;;An Analysis of Lexical Errors Made by Chinese Students in English Study[J];海外英语;2011年13期
6 黄远振;;英语lexical triplets反义现象[J];福建外语;1993年Z1期
7 付雪芬;程金花;;Geliable Lexical Borrowings in China English on the Internet[J];海外英语;2012年21期
8 ;Determinants of lexical access in pure-anomic recovery:a longitudinal study[J];Journal of Zhejiang University(Science B:An International Biomedicine & Biotechnology Journal);2009年05期
9 张景京;;Lexical Semantic Ambiguity in English[J];科技信息;2010年17期
10 沈艳萍;;Agreeing and disagreeing with construction coercion[J];校园英语;2018年10期
11 温俊毅;;The Role of Lexical Phrases in Second Language Acquisition[J];海外英语;2012年01期
12 胡悦;;English Loan Words in Chinese[J];海外英语;2016年10期
13 黄丹丹;;Book Review of Cross-linguistic Influences[J];海外英语;2013年13期
14 崔淑慧;;An Analysis on Lexical Chunk and the Teaching Method[J];海外英语;2015年02期
15 Wei-Yi Ma;Peng Zhou;Stephen Crain;Li-Qun Gao;;Lexical Tones and Word Learning in Mandarin-Speaking Children at Three Years of Age(Invited paper)[J];Journal of Electronic Science and Technology;2017年01期
16 江韵;;Application of Lexical Approach to Teaching of Business English Correspondence[J];海外英语;2015年20期
17 魏烨;;On Reclassification of Verbs in Ditransitive Constructions(DC)[J];海外英语;2016年03期
18 高岩;;The Analysis of Lexical Approach in Language Teaching[J];沙洋师范高等专科学校学报;2012年02期
19 杨辉;;The Semantic Analysis of Lexical Ambiguity[J];科技信息;2012年25期
20 何晴;侯先绒;;Study on C-E Translation of Lexical Items with Chinese Characteristics in the Report on the 19th National Congress of the CPC[J];海外英语;2018年13期
中国重要会议论文全文数据库 前10条
1 Keke Yu;Yuan Chen;Ruiming Wang;;The interaction between phonological information and pitch type in the processing of lexical tones at attentive stage[A];第二十一届全国心理学学术会议摘要集[C];2018年
2 吴君如;Yiya Chen;Vincent J van Heuven;Niels O Schiller;;Applying functional partition in the investigation of lexical tonal-pattern categories in an under-resourced Chinese dialect[A];第十四届全国人机语音通讯学术会议(NCMMSC’2017)论文集[C];2017年
3 刘莎莎;;On Hans Marchand's Analysis of Word-formation[A];语言与文化研究(第五辑)[C];2010年
4 JaneTsay;JamesMyers;;Processes In The Production Of Taiwanese Tone Sandhi:An Acoustic Phonetic Study[A];新世纪的现代语音学——第五届全国现代语音学学术会议论文集[C];2001年
5 Deborah S.Davison;;Tianjinese Tone Sandhi in Action:A Role for Stress & Metrics in Mandarin[A];第六届全国现代语音学学术会议论文集(下)[C];2003年
6 Aili Hsin;Karen Chen;;On chui and shai in Mandarin Chinese[A];第六届汉语词汇语义学研讨会论文集[C];2005年
7 Peiqing Jin;Xunyi Pan;Cheng Luo;Naifei Su;Nai Ding;;Attention modulation of neural entrainment to hierarchical linguistic structures[A];中国神经科学学会第十二届全国学术会议论文集[C];2017年
8 ;Semantic Interpretation of Compound Nominalization Using Bilingual Lexical Ontologies[A];第四届全国信息检索与内容安全学术会议论文集(下)[C];2008年
9 赵磊;;Critical Discourse Analysis:President John F.Kennedy's Inaugural Address as Cases[A];外语教育与翻译发展创新研究(第五卷)[C];2016年
10 Guo Xiuzhen;Luan Yuqin;;The Application of Output Hypothesis to College English Teaching[A];2013年教育技术与管理科学国际会议论文集[C];2013年
中国博士学位论文全文数据库 前9条
1 张京鱼;操汉语的英语学习者对心理谓词的习得:语义突显层级模式[D];广东外语外贸大学;2002年
2 尹洪山;语篇中前置句法结构的语用制约[D];山东大学;2007年
3 朱青菊;高频会话词串对英语听说能力的影响研究[D];上海外国语大学;2012年
4 纪小凌;中国英语专业学生二语写作中的发展特征[D];上海外国语大学;2006年
5 蔡君梅;语言类型特征可迁移性的认知研究[D];上海外国语大学;2006年
6 王静萍;任务复杂度对学习者二语写作表现的影响研究[D];南京大学;2017年
7 桑紫林;合作产出对中国中等水平英语学习者的二语书面语发展影响研究[D];华东师范大学;2016年
8 谢都全;论元实现和事件结构:动词短语句法[D];上海交通大学;2009年
9 WANG Jiayue;[D];广东外语外贸大学;2003年
中国硕士学位论文全文数据库 前10条
1 杨沙沙;英语议论文词汇和句法复杂度研究[D];广西大学;2018年
2 李玉玲;初中生英语写作中的词汇运用错误研究[D];河南师范大学;2018年
3 郭清河;基于非英语专业学生英语写作词汇错误的一项实证研究[D];兰州交通大学;2018年
4 陈静雯;任务后形式聚焦对英语学习者口语产出影响的实验研究[D];广州大学;2018年
5 陈有君;二语对一语词汇应用的影响:基于语料库的对比研究[D];南京师范大学;2018年
6 闫静;基于多文本阅读的词汇教学对发展初中生写作词汇丰富性的实证研究[D];山西师范大学;2018年
7 梁晓磊;基于语料库的中外学者期刊论文摘要中外壳名词对比研究[D];大连外国语大学;2018年
8 陈丽英;语块输入与商务英语写作相关性研究[D];广西大学;2014年
9 宗文娟;词块教学法在高中英语写作教学中的运用[D];山东大学;2013年
10 胡文杰;二语词汇能力发展心理模式[D];上海师范大学;2005年
 快捷付款方式  订购知网充值卡  订购热线  帮助中心
  • 400-819-9993
  • 010-62982499
  • 010-62783978